A good practice I've implemented is to divide my tasks into quadrants based on urgency and importance.
The first quadrant, high urgency and high importance, requires immediate action and often relates to unforeseen scenarios or critical deadlines. It's essential to address these promptly, which sometimes entails delegating them to competent team members, especially if they possess expertise in the area.
The second one, high importance but low urgency, is about strategic tasks that shape the big picture and long-term goals. These get scheduled promptly in my calendar for focused attention, ensuring they're prioritized appropriately.
The third quadrant, low importance and high urgency, usually signifies distractions or interruptions that can be time-consuming. I handle these only after completing the more meaningful tasks and, if possible, by assigning them to someone else.
Finally, the fourth category, low urgency and low importance, comprises tasks that can often be eliminated or relegated to the back burner. These might include menial or redundant jobs that don't require immediate attention.
This system helps me visually organize my to-do list and enhances my ability to delegate effectively, ensuring that I focus on the most meaningful tasks. It's a work in progress, but it has already made a significant difference in managing my workload more efficiently.